Why does this study matter?
With these elements in mind, this study investigated the nature of the relationship between staff perceptions of safety and security and the extent to which different ED layouts influenced staff visibility of unit activities.
How was the study done?
Data collection consisted of both staff interviews and on-site observations in five different ED facilities. After testing the interview questions and observation procedures at one site, researchers branched out to include four other facilities from the same health system. The 17 staff interviewed had a minimum of 3 years’ experience in the ED setting and had been employed at their current facility for at least one year. Interviews from all five sites were included in the final analysis. The limited number of observations from the pilot ED were not included in the final observation analysis, but the included facilities represented a variety of layouts including a linear layout with three staff workstations; two EDs with different pod arrangements; and an ED with one main area, a nurse station at each end and separate trauma and fast-track areas.
So what do we learn from the study?
Interview and observational data were categorized into two main themes with seven overlapping subthemes. The first theme, visibility, highlighted the benefits of visibility in mitigating risk and responding to emergencies. Subtheme topics included the challenge of differing visibility levels across locations; different types of visibility; different visibility priorities, and visibility related to security and security staff. The second theme was specific to security and included subthemes regarding –again- the presence of security officer(s), risks associated with psychiatric patients, psychiatric patient room location, and issues with staff being able to locate one another.
Can we say the results are definitive?
Noted limitations include the lag between data collection in 2016 and article publication in 2023, the need to include a wider variety of ED settings and layouts, the potential to include perceptions of different staff groups, and the need to explore post-pandemic care routines of psychiatric patients due to changing dynamics. Other limitations include the lack of differentiation between perceptions of physicians, nurses, and other ED personnel since 17 medical staff members in five different facilities were interviewed but only two RNs and one physician were noted.
What’s the takeaway?
Design recommendations related to facility design that were identified from this study include:
Summary of:
Gharaveis, A., Hamilton, D. K., Pati, D., Shepley, M. M., Rodiek, S., McCall, D., (2023) How Visibility May Reduce Security Issues in Community Hospitals’ Emergency Departments, HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, Pages in press https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231188985
Our slidecasts are an outcome of the popular Research Matters presentations at the annual Healthcare Design Expo & Conference. Our research team picks papers that have some significance to the healthcare design community and distill the study down into a 5-minute summary of how the study was done, what was learned, the limitations and the takeaway. The slidecasts bring research to you in digestible format. Just five minutes, and you’ll know more.